lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] extcon: extcon-axp288: use low level P-Unit semaphore lock for axp288 register accesses
From
Date
Hi All,

On 9/9/21 5:18 PM, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> use low level P-Unit semaphore lock for axp288 register
> accesses directly and for more than one access a time,
> to reduce the number of times this semaphore is locked
> and released which is an expensive operation.
>
> i2c-bus to the XPower is shared between the kernel and the
> SoCs P-Unit. The P-Unit has a semaphore wich the kernel must
> lock for axp288 register accesses. When the P-Unit semaphore
> is locked CPU and GPU power states cannot change or the system
> will freeze.
>
> The P-Unit semaphore lock is already managed inside the regmap
> access logic, but for each access the semaphore is locked and
> released. So use directly iosf_mbi_(un)block_punit_i2c_access(),
> we are safe in doing so because nested calls to the same
> semaphore are turned to nops.
>
> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>

Thanks, patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

I've also given it a test run on a Chuwi Hibook which uses this PMIC:

Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Regards,

Hans




> ---
> drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> index fdb31954cf2b..460402b14ef2 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> #include <asm/intel-family.h>
> +#include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
>
> /* Power source status register */
> #define PS_STAT_VBUS_TRIGGER BIT(0)
> @@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ static int axp288_handle_chrg_det_event(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
> unsigned int cable = info->previous_cable;
> bool vbus_attach = false;
>
> + iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access();
> +
> vbus_attach = axp288_get_vbus_attach(info);
> if (!vbus_attach)
> goto no_vbus;
> @@ -253,6 +256,8 @@ static int axp288_handle_chrg_det_event(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
> }
>
> no_vbus:
> + iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access();
> +
> extcon_set_state_sync(info->edev, info->previous_cable, false);
> if (info->previous_cable == EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP)
> extcon_set_state_sync(info->edev, EXTCON_USB, false);
> @@ -275,6 +280,8 @@ static int axp288_handle_chrg_det_event(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
> return 0;
>
> dev_det_ret:
> + iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access();
> +
> if (ret < 0)
> dev_err(info->dev, "failed to detect BC Mod\n");
>
> @@ -307,11 +314,14 @@ static irqreturn_t axp288_extcon_isr(int irq, void *data)
>
> static void axp288_extcon_enable(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
> {
> + iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access();
> regmap_update_bits(info->regmap, AXP288_BC_GLOBAL_REG,
> BC_GLOBAL_RUN, 0);
> /* Enable the charger detection logic */
> regmap_update_bits(info->regmap, AXP288_BC_GLOBAL_REG,
> BC_GLOBAL_RUN, BC_GLOBAL_RUN);
> +
> + iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access();
> }
>
> static void axp288_put_role_sw(void *data)
> @@ -384,10 +394,14 @@ static int axp288_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> + iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access();
> +
> info->vbus_attach = axp288_get_vbus_attach(info);
>
> axp288_extcon_log_rsi(info);
>
> + iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access();
> +
> /* Initialize extcon device */
> info->edev = devm_extcon_dev_allocate(&pdev->dev,
> axp288_extcon_cables);
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-09 18:21    [W:0.099 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site