Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Sep 2021 21:13:26 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 08/11] context_tracking,rcu: Replace RCU dynticks counter with context_tracking |
| |
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:37:01AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> And what happens to all of this in !CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING kernels? > Of course, RCU needs it unconditionally. (There appear to be at least > parts of it that are unconditionally available, but I figured that I > should ask. Especially given the !CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING definition > of the __context_tracking_cpu_seq() function.)
For !CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING it goes *poof*.
Since the thing was called dynticks, I presumed it was actually dynticks only, silly me (also, I didn't see any obvious !context_tracking usage of it, i'll go audit it more carefully.
| |