lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] misc: fastrpc: reject non-secure node for secure domain
From
Date


On 24/09/2021 13:19, Jeya R wrote:
> Reject session if domain is secure and device non-secure. Also check if
> opened device node is proper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeya R <jeyr@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> index 631713d..adf2700 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ struct fastrpc_user {
> spinlock_t lock;
> /* lock for allocations */
> struct mutex mutex;
> + int dev_minor;
> };
>
> static void fastrpc_free_map(struct kref *ref)
> @@ -1013,6 +1014,17 @@ static int fastrpc_internal_invoke(struct fastrpc_user *fl, u32 kernel,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int is_session_rejected(struct fastrpc_user *fl)
> +{
> + /* Check if the device node is non-secure and channel is secure*/
> + if ((fl->dev_minor == fl->cctx->miscdev.minor) && fl->cctx->secure) {
> + dev_err(&fl->cctx->rpdev->dev, "Cannot use non-secure device"
> + "node on secure channel\n");

Am bit confused here,

so we create 2 device nodes /dev/fastrpc-adsp, /dev/fastrpc-adsp-secure
and mark any domain other than cdsp as secure
then here we check if access is via /dev/fastrpc-adsp then reject it.

But question is why did we even create /dev/fastrpc-adsp in first place?

Can you explain how is this secure and non secure nodes supposed to work?

> + return -EACCES;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int fastrpc_init_create_process(struct fastrpc_user *fl,
> char __user *argp)
> {
> @@ -1033,6 +1045,10 @@ static int fastrpc_init_create_process(struct fastrpc_user *fl,
> } inbuf;
> u32 sc;
>
> + err = is_session_rejected(fl);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> args = kcalloc(FASTRPC_CREATE_PROCESS_NARGS, sizeof(*args), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!args)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1221,6 +1237,7 @@ static int fastrpc_device_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> struct fastrpc_user *fl = NULL;
> struct miscdevice *currdev = NULL;
> unsigned long flags;
> + int dev_minor = MINOR(inode->i_rdev);
>
> if (!filp)
> return -EFAULT;
> @@ -1234,6 +1251,12 @@ static int fastrpc_device_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> else
> cctx = miscdev_to_cctx(filp->private_data);
>

> + if (!((dev_minor == cctx->miscdev.minor) ||
> + (dev_minor == cctx->securedev.minor))) {
> + dev_err(&cctx->rpdev->dev, "Device node is not proper\n");
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }

This is bit of over checking, how can we enter without accessing proper
device node?

> +
> fl = kzalloc(sizeof(*fl), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!fl)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1250,6 +1273,7 @@ static int fastrpc_device_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->user);
> fl->tgid = current->tgid;
> fl->cctx = cctx;
> + fl->dev_minor = dev_minor;
>
> fl->sctx = fastrpc_session_alloc(cctx);
> if (!fl->sctx) {
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-29 16:07    [W:0.079 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site