lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Scale wakeup granularity relative to nr_running
On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 11:22, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 10:40 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >
> > a 100us value should even be enough to fix Mel's problem without
> > impacting common wakeup preemption cases.
>
> It'd be nice if it turn out to be something that simple, but color me
> skeptical. I've tried various preemption throttling schemes, and while

Let's see what the results will show. I tend to agree that this will
not be enough to cover all use cases and I don't see any other way to
cover all cases than getting some inputs from the threads about their
latency fairness which bring us back to some kind of latency niceness
value

> it was trivial to get promising results, my scheme always managed to
> harm something. Everything I ever tried, I ended up tossing.
>
> -Mike

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-23 14:43    [W:0.144 / U:0.716 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site