Messages in this thread | | | From | Christoph Paasch <> | Date | Thu, 2 Sep 2021 08:53:32 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next v5] skb_expand_head() adjust skb->truesize incorrectly |
| |
On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 4:12 AM Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com> wrote: > > Christoph Paasch reports [1] about incorrect skb->truesize > after skb_expand_head() call in ip6_xmit. > This may happen because of two reasons: > - skb_set_owner_w() for newly cloned skb is called too early, > before pskb_expand_head() where truesize is adjusted for (!skb-sk) case. > - pskb_expand_head() does not adjust truesize in (skb->sk) case. > In this case sk->sk_wmem_alloc should be adjusted too. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/20/1082 > > Fixes: f1260ff15a71 ("skbuff: introduce skb_expand_head()") > Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com> > --- > v5: fixed else condition, thanks to Eric > reworked update of expanded skb, > added corresponding comments > v4: decided to use is_skb_wmem() after pskb_expand_head() call > fixed 'return (EXPRESSION);' in os_skb_wmem according to Eric Dumazet > v3: removed __pskb_expand_head(), > added is_skb_wmem() helper for skb with wmem-compatible destructors > there are 2 ways to use it: > - before pskb_expand_head(), to create skb clones > - after successfull pskb_expand_head() to change owner on extended skb. > v2: based on patch version from Eric Dumazet, > added __pskb_expand_head() function, which can be forced > to adjust skb->truesize and sk->sk_wmem_alloc. > --- > include/net/sock.h | 1 + > net/core/skbuff.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > net/core/sock.c | 8 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Still the same issues around refcount as I reported in my other email.
Did you try running the syzkaller reproducer on your setup?
Christoph
> > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h > index 95b2577..173d58c 100644 > --- a/include/net/sock.h > +++ b/include/net/sock.h > @@ -1695,6 +1695,7 @@ struct sk_buff *sock_wmalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size, int force, > gfp_t priority); > void __sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb); > void sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb); > +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb); > struct sk_buff *sock_omalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size, > gfp_t priority); > void skb_orphan_partial(struct sk_buff *skb); > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c > index f931176..29bb92e7 100644 > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c > @@ -1804,28 +1804,73 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_realloc_headroom(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom) > struct sk_buff *skb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom) > { > int delta = headroom - skb_headroom(skb); > + int osize = skb_end_offset(skb); > + struct sk_buff *oskb = NULL; > + struct sock *sk = skb->sk; > > if (WARN_ONCE(delta <= 0, > "%s is expecting an increase in the headroom", __func__)) > return skb; > > - /* pskb_expand_head() might crash, if skb is shared */ > + delta = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta); > + /* pskb_expand_head() might crash, if skb is shared. > + * Also we should clone skb if its destructor does > + * not adjust skb->truesize and sk->sk_wmem_alloc > + */ > if (skb_shared(skb)) { > struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC); > > - if (likely(nskb)) { > - if (skb->sk) > - skb_set_owner_w(nskb, skb->sk); > - consume_skb(skb); > - } else { > + if (unlikely(!nskb)) { > kfree_skb(skb); > + return NULL; > } > + oskb = skb; > skb = nskb; > } > - if (skb && > - pskb_expand_head(skb, SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta), 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) { > + if (pskb_expand_head(skb, delta, 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) { > kfree_skb(skb); > - skb = NULL; > + kfree_skb(oskb); > + return NULL; > + } > + if (oskb) { > + if (sk) > + skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk); > + consume_skb(oskb); > + } else if (sk && skb->destructor != sock_edemux) { > + bool ref, set_owner; > + > + ref = false; set_owner = false; > + delta = osize - skb_end_offset(skb); > + /* skb_set_owner_w() calls current skb destructor. > + * It can decrease sk_wmem_alloc to 0 and release sk, > + * To prevnt it we increase sk_wmem_alloc earlier. > + * Another kind of destructors can release last sk_refcnt, > + * so it will be impossible to call sock_hold for !fullsock > + * Take extra sk_refcnt to prevent it. > + * Otherwise just increase truesize of expanded skb. > + */ > + refcount_add(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc); > + if (!is_skb_wmem(skb)) { > + set_owner = true; > + if (!sk_fullsock(sk) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)) { > + /* skb_set_owner_w can set sock_edemux */ > + ref = refcount_inc_not_zero(&sk->sk_refcnt); > + if (!ref) { > + set_owner = false; > + WARN_ON(refcount_sub_and_test(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc)); > + } > + } > + } > + if (set_owner) > + skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk); > +#ifdef CONFIG_INET > + if (skb->destructor == sock_edemux) { > + WARN_ON(refcount_sub_and_test(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc)); > + if (ref) > + WARN_ON(refcount_dec_and_test(&sk->sk_refcnt)); > + } > +#endif > + skb->truesize += delta; > } > return skb; > } > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c > index 950f1e7..6cbda43 100644 > --- a/net/core/sock.c > +++ b/net/core/sock.c > @@ -2227,6 +2227,14 @@ void skb_set_owner_w(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_set_owner_w); > > +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb) > +{ > + return skb->destructor == sock_wfree || > + skb->destructor == __sock_wfree || > + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) && skb->destructor == tcp_wfree); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_skb_wmem); > + > static bool can_skb_orphan_partial(const struct sk_buff *skb) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE > -- > 1.8.3.1 >
| |