lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [v6 07/11] iio: adc: aspeed: Fix the calculate error of clock.
On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 01:12:13 +0000
Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com> wrote:

> On 2021/9/13, 3:51 PM, "Billy Tsai" <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com> wrote:
>
> > The ADC clock formula is
> > ast2400/2500:
> > ADC clock period = PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[31:17] + 1) * (ADC0C[9:0] + 1)
> > ast2600:
> > ADC clock period = PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[15:0] + 1)
> > They all have one fixed divided 2 and the legacy driver didn't handle it.
> > This patch register the fixed factory clock device as the parent of ADC
> > clock scaler to fix this issue.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> > index 3ec4e1a2ddd3..262b5f80c728 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c
> > @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@
> > *
> > * Copyright (C) 2017 Google, Inc.
> > * Copyright (C) 2021 Aspeed Technology Inc.
> > + *
> > + * ADC clock formula:
> > + * Ast2400/Ast2500:
> > + * clock period = period of PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[31:17] + 1) * (ADC0C[9:0] + 1)
> > + * Ast2600:
> > + * clock period = period of PCLK * 2 * (ADC0C[15:0] + 1)
> > */
>
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > @@ -85,6 +91,7 @@ struct aspeed_adc_data {
> > struct regulator *regulator;
> > void __iomem *base;
> > spinlock_t clk_lock;
> > + struct clk_hw *fixed_div_clk;
> > struct clk_hw *clk_prescaler;
> > struct clk_hw *clk_scaler;
> > struct reset_control *rst;
> > @@ -197,6 +204,13 @@ static const struct iio_info aspeed_adc_iio_info = {
> > .debugfs_reg_access = aspeed_adc_reg_access,
> > };
>
> > +static void aspeed_adc_unregister_fixed_divider(void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct clk_hw *clk = data;
> > +
> > + clk_hw_unregister_fixed_factor(clk);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void aspeed_adc_reset_assert(void *data)
> > {
> > struct reset_control *rst = data;
> > @@ -321,6 +335,19 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > spin_lock_init(&data->clk_lock);
> > snprintf(clk_parent_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_parent_name), "%s",
> > of_clk_get_parent_name(pdev->dev.of_node, 0));
> > + snprintf(clk_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_name), "%s-fixed-div",
> > + data->model_data->model_name);
> > + data->fixed_div_clk = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(
> > + &pdev->dev, clk_name, clk_parent_name, 0, 1, 2);
> > + if (IS_ERR(data->fixed_div_clk))
> > + return PTR_ERR(data->fixed_div_clk);
> > +
> > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(data->dev,
> > + aspeed_adc_unregister_fixed_divider,
> > + data->clk_prescaler);
>
> I found that the parameter aspeed_adc_unregister_fixed_divider is wrong.
> I will send patch v7 after the other patches are reviewed.

I took another look at the series and I'm happy with all of them so will
(almost certainly) pick them up at v7 unless other reviews come in.

Thanks,

Jonathan

>
> Thanks
>
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + snprintf(clk_parent_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_parent_name), clk_name);
>
> > if (data->model_data->need_prescaler) {
> > snprintf(clk_name, ARRAY_SIZE(clk_name), "%s-prescaler",
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-18 19:55    [W:0.057 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site