lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: WARNING in btrfs_run_delayed_refs
From
Date


On 2021/9/15 上午10:56, Hao Sun wrote:
> Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> 于2021年9月15日周三 上午10:20写道:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2021/9/15 上午10:14, Hao Sun wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> When using Healer to fuzz the latest Linux kernel, the following crash
>>> was triggered.
>>>
>>> HEAD commit: 6880fa6c5660 Linux 5.15-rc1
>>> git tree: upstream
>>> console output:
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gd0dl74MyvvVAYqsCDKSGmcfpZszD0kt/view?usp=sharing
>>> kernel config: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rUzyMbe5vcs6khA3tL9EHTLJvsUdWcgB/view?usp=sharing
>>> C reproducer: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WKQukijOJ7D0NYk1iKf47FESjYfAjrlz/view?usp=sharing
>>> Syzlang reproducer:
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Gi9-Mgbrjw1OI-ymO4zDVIFej2Qf4ppL/view?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> If you fix this issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
>>> Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> loop11: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
>>> BTRFS info (device loop11): disk space caching is enabled
>>> BTRFS info (device loop11): has skinny extents
>>> BTRFS info (device loop11): enabling ssd optimizations
>>> FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
>>> name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0
>>> CPU: 0 PID: 7769 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1 #16
>>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
>>> rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
>>> Call Trace:
>>> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
>>> dump_stack_lvl+0x8d/0xcf lib/dump_stack.c:106
>>> fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:52 [inline]
>>> should_fail+0x13c/0x160 lib/fault-inject.c:146
>>> should_failslab+0x5/0x10 mm/slab_common.c:1328
>>> slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.99+0x4e/0xc0 mm/slab.h:494
>>> slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3120 [inline]
>>> slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3214 [inline]
>>> kmem_cache_alloc+0x44/0x280 mm/slub.c:3219
>>> __btrfs_free_extent.isra.53+0x7b/0x1180 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2942
>>> run_delayed_tree_ref fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1687 [inline]
>>> run_one_delayed_ref fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1711 [inline]
>>> btrfs_run_delayed_refs_for_head fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1952 [inline]
>>> __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x83e/0x1a00 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2017
>>> btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xb1/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2148
>>> btrfs_commit_transaction+0x7d/0x1430 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2065
>>> btrfs_sync_fs+0x9a/0x430 fs/btrfs/super.c:1426
>>> btrfs_ioctl+0x209b/0x3be0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4970
>>> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
>>> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
>>> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
>>> __x64_sys_ioctl+0xb6/0x100 fs/ioctl.c:860
>>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>>> do_syscall_64+0x34/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>>> RIP: 0033:0x46ae99
>>> Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48
>>> 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d
>>> 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
>>> RSP: 002b:00007f8ac08c7c48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000078c0a0 RCX: 000000000046ae99
>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000009408 RDI: 0000000000000003
>>> RBP: 00007f8ac08c7c80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
>>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000003
>>> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000078c0a0 R15: 00007ffccc1d6390
>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 7769 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2150
>>> btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x245/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2150
>>
>> This is again btrfs_abort_transaction().
>>
>> This makes me wonder, should we add ENOMEM to abort transaction warning
>> condition to make the ENOMEM injection code happy.
>>
>> Mind to test the following diff?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qu
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> index 8c6ee947a68d..6bc79f6716fa 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
>> @@ -3548,7 +3548,8 @@ do {
>> \
>> /* Report first abort since mount */ \
>> if (!test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_TRANS_ABORTED, \
>> &((trans)->fs_info->fs_state))) { \
>> - if ((errno) != -EIO && (errno) != -EROFS) { \
>> + if ((errno) != -EIO && (errno) != -EROFS && \
>> + (errno) != -ENOMEM) { \
>> WARN(1, KERN_DEBUG \
>> "BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error %d)\n", \
>> (errno)); \
>>
>
> Just tested it. This did fixed most `WARNING` reports, e.g., "WARNING
> in btrfs_add_link", "WARNING in btrfs_run_delayed_refs".
> I think it would be better if we can judge whether the `ENOMEM` is
> caused by `fault injection` or not.
>
This is really hard to distinguish.

If the fuzzer test tool can do it by relating the transaction abort
message with error injection log, it would save us a lot of time and
prevent false alerts.

For now, I guess the above diff would be a quick and dirty filter for
ENOMEM injection tests.

Thanks,
Qu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-15 05:14    [W:0.039 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site