lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] perf annotate: Add fusion logic for AMD microarchs
From
Date


On 10-Sep-21 7:49 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:47:31PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>>
>>>> +static bool x86__ins_is_fused(struct arch *arch, const char *ins1,
>>>> + const char *ins2)
>>>> +{
>>>> + if (strstarts(arch->vendor, "AuthenticAMD"))
>>>> + return amd__ins_is_fused(arch, ins1, ins2);
>>>> +
>>>> + return intel__ins_is_fused(arch, ins1, ins2);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Can we instead make x86__ins_is_fused be a pointer and instead of
>>> storing arch->vendor we set it to one of amd__ins_is_fused() or
>>> intel__ins_is_fused()?
>>>
>>> I.e. here:
>>>
>>>> static int x86__cpuid_parse(struct arch *arch, char *cpuid)
>>>> {
>>>> unsigned int family, model, stepping;
>>>> @@ -184,6 +216,9 @@ static int x86__cpuid_parse(struct arch *arch, char *cpuid)
>>>> if (ret == 3) {
>>>> arch->family = family;
>>>> arch->model = model;
>>>> + arch->vendor = strndup(cpuid, 12);
>>>
>>> x86__ins_is_fused = strstarts(cpuid, "AuthenticAMD") ?
>>> amd__ins_is_fused :
>>> intel__ins_is_fused;
>>
>> Sure. Will post v2.
>
> Thanks, if you're quick we may get this into this merge window :-)

v2 Posted: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210911043854.8373-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com

Thanks,
Ravi

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-09-11 06:43    [W:0.055 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site