Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: ibmvtpm: Rename tpm_process_cmd to tpm_status and define flag | From | Stefan Berger <> | Date | Fri, 6 Aug 2021 08:08:27 -0400 |
| |
On 8/6/21 7:25 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 05:52:55PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: >> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> >> >> Rename the field tpm_processing_cmd to tpm_status in ibmvtpm_dev and set >> the TPM_STATUS_BUSY flag while the vTPM is busy processing a command. >> >> Fixes: 6674ff145eef ("tpm_ibmvtpm: properly handle interrupted packet receptions") >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> >> Cc: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com> >> Cc: George Wilson <gcwilson@linux.ibm.com> > Please put the bug fix first because otherwise it will be dependent of this > patch, which is bad thing when it comes to backporting.
Yes, and that's why I have this one here also with a Fix tag. I basically don't want to logically '&' with the 'true' flag but want this TPM_STATUS_BUSY flag first.
Stefan
> > /Jarkko
| |