lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw/emac: switch to use skb_put_padto()
From
Date
hi Jakub, David,

On 06/08/2021 12:30, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org wrote:
> Hello:
>
> This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
>
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:55:52 +0300 you wrote:
>> hi
>>
>> Now frame padding in TI TI CPSW/EMAC is implemented in a bit of entangled way as
>> frame SKB padded in drivers (without skb->len) while frame length fixed in CPDMA.
>> Things became even more confusing hence CPSW switcdev driver need to perform min
>> TX frame length correction in switch mode [1].
>>
>> [...]
>
> Here is the summary with links:
> - [net-next,1/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: switch to use skb_put_padto()
> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/1f88d5d566b8
> - [net-next,2/3] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_emac: switch to use skb_put_padto()
> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/61e7a22da75b
> - [net-next,3/3] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: drop frame padding
> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/9ffc513f95ee

I'm terribly sorry for the mess here - this series depends from patch
"net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix min eth packet size for non-switch use-cases" [1]

Not sure what I've being thinking about I've had to note it or include in this series :(

I'm very sorry again - can it be dropped?

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210805145511.12016-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com/

--
Best regards,
grygorii

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-06 12:03    [W:1.415 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site