lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v7 0/5] make '%pD' print the full path of file
Date
Hi Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 10:12 PM
> To: Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>; Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>; Sergey Senozhatsky
> <senozhatsky@chromium.org>; Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>; Rasmus Villemoes
> <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>; Linus
> Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>; Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
> <peterz@infradead.org>; Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>; Ahmed S.
> Darwish <a.darwish@linutronix.de>; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Matthew Wilcox
> <willy@infradead.org>; Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>; nd
> <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] make '%pD' print the full path of file
>
> On Thu 2021-07-15 09:14:02, Jia He wrote:
> > Background
> > ==========
> > Linus suggested printing the full path of file instead of printing
> > the components as '%pd'.
> >
> > Typically, there is no need for printk specifiers to take any real locks
> > (ie mount_lock or rename_lock). So I introduce a new helper
> > d_path_unsafe() which is similar to d_path() except it doesn't take any
> > seqlock/spinlock.
> >
> > TODO
> > ====
> > I plan to do the followup work after '%pD' behavior is changed.
> > - s390/hmcdrv: remove the redundant directory path in printing string.
> > - fs/iomap: simplify the iomap_swapfile_fail() with '%pD'.
> > - simplify the string printing when file_path() is invoked(in some
> > cases, not all).
> > - change the previous '%pD[2,3,4]' to '%pD'
> >
> > Jia He (4):
> > d_path: fix Kernel doc validator complaints
> > d_path: introduce helper d_path_unsafe()
> > lib/vsprintf.c: make '%pD' print the full path of file
> > lib/test_printf.c: add test cases for '%pD'
> >
> > Rasmus Villemoes (1):
> > lib/test_printf.c: split write-beyond-buffer check in two
>
> The patchset is ready for linux-next from my POV.
>
> I could take it via printk tree if Al provides Acks for the
> first two "d_path: *: patches.
>
> Or Al could take it via his tree if he would prefer to do so.

Kindly ping 😉

--
Cheers,
Justin (Jia He)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-05 02:40    [W:0.154 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site