Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v10 05/17] vhost-vdpa: Fail the vhost_vdpa_set_status() on reset failure | From | Jason Wang <> | Date | Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:10:46 +0800 |
| |
在 2021/7/29 下午3:34, Xie Yongji 写道: > Re-read the device status to ensure it's set to zero during > resetting. Otherwise, fail the vhost_vdpa_set_status() after timeout. > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > index b07aa161f7ad..dd05c1e1133c 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp) > struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa; > const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config; > u8 status, status_old; > - int nvqs = v->nvqs; > + int timeout = 0, nvqs = v->nvqs; > u16 i; > > if (copy_from_user(&status, statusp, sizeof(status))) > @@ -173,6 +173,15 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp) > return -EINVAL; > > ops->set_status(vdpa, status); > + if (status == 0) { > + while (ops->get_status(vdpa)) { > + timeout += 20; > + if (timeout > VDPA_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS) > + return -EIO; > + > + msleep(20); > + }
Spec has introduced the reset a one of the basic facility. And consider we differ reset here.
This makes me think if it's better to introduce a dedicated vdpa ops for reset?
Thanks
> + } > > if ((status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) && !(status_old & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK)) > for (i = 0; i < nvqs; i++)
| |