Messages in this thread | | | From | Keith Packard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] treewide: Replace 0-element memcpy() destinations with flexible arrays | Date | Wed, 25 Aug 2021 22:24:18 -0700 |
| |
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
> In some cases, use of the flex_array() helper is needed when a flexible > array is part of a union.
The code below seems to show that the helper is also needed when the flexible array is the only member of a struct? Or is this just an extension of the 'part of a union' clause?
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ struct bmi_cmd { > > union bmi_resp { > struct { > - u8 payload[0]; > + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(u8, payload); > } read_mem; > struct { > __le32 result;
-- -keith [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |