lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] PM: sleep: core: Avoid setting power.must_resume to false
On 2021-08-13 00:23, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 01:05:38PM -0700, Prasad Sodagudi wrote:
>> There are variables(power.may_skip_resume and dev->power.must_resume)
>> and DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME flags to control the resume of devices
>> after
>> a system wide suspend transition.
>>
>> Setting the DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME flag means that the driver allows
>> its "noirq" and "early" resume callbacks to be skipped if the device
>> can be left in suspend after a system-wide transition into the working
>> state. PM core determines that the driver's "noirq" and "early" resume
>> callbacks should be skipped or not with dev_pm_skip_resume() function
>> by
>> checking power.may_skip_resume variable.
>>
>> power.must_resume variable is getting set to false in
>> __device_suspend()
>> function without checking device's DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME and
>> dev->power.usage_count variables. In problematic scenario, where
>> all the devices in the suspend_late stage are successful and some
>> device can fail to suspend in suspend_noirq phase. So some devices
>> successfully suspended in suspend_late stage are not getting chance
>> to execute __device_suspend_noirq() to set dev->power.must_resume
>> variable to true and not getting resumed in early_resume phase.
>>
>> Add a check for device's DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME flag before
>> setting power.must_resume variable in __device_suspend function.
>>
>> Fixes: 6e176bf8d461 ("PM: sleep: core: Do not skip callbacks in the
>> resume phase")
>> Signed-off-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> V2 -> V3: Format issues patch posting
>> V1 -> V2: Fixed indentation and commit text to include scenario
>> drivers/base/power/main.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> index d568772..9ee6987 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> @@ -1642,7 +1642,11 @@ static int __device_suspend(struct device *dev,
>> pm_message_t state, bool async)
>> }
>>
>> dev->power.may_skip_resume = true;
>> - dev->power.must_resume = false;
>> + if ((atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count) <= 1) &&
>> + (dev_pm_test_driver_flags(dev, DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME)))
>> + dev->power.must_resume = false;
>> + else
>> + dev->power.must_resume = true;
>
> Again, what happens if the usage_count changes right after reading the
> value? What protects that from happening?

Hi Gregh KH,
Yes. you are right. I think, relying on the usage_count at the
__device_suspend stage may not be correct.
Devices IRQs are still enabled and usage_count can be changed even after
reading.
I will send next patchset without power.usage_count check.

@@ -1649,7 +1651,10 @@ static int __device_suspend(struct device *dev,
pm_message_t state, bool async)
}

dev->power.may_skip_resume = true;
- dev->power.must_resume = false;
+ if (dev_pm_test_driver_flags(dev, DPM_FLAG_MAY_SKIP_RESUME))
+ dev->power.must_resume = false;
+ else
+ dev->power.must_resume = true;


>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-23 15:06    [W:0.062 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site