lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add RK3399 Gru gpio-line-names
Date
Am Freitag, 20. August 2021, 23:16:23 CEST schrieb Brian Norris:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:05 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> > I guess one minor nit (now that I look back on the veyron patch where
> > I mentioned it explicitly in the commit message) is that on the veyron
> > ones we sorted this down at the bottom with the other pinctrl stuff
> > instead of sorting it alphabetically with everything else. I'll let
> > Heiko say which he likes better.
>
> Huh, didn't notice that semi-convention. I can sort it however Heiko prefers.

Hmm, I wouldn't call it a semi-convention ... it was more an idea of
getting all the longer pages of "stuff" out of the way.

I don't think I have a real hard preference for the gpioX nodes
and I guess in the long run it might be helpful to try to limit the
number of "semi-conventions" .

I still like "pinctrl at the bottom", but I guess it might be easier to
with alphabetical for nodes with the rest :-) .


Heiko



> > I also notice for veyron that we had a second "ABI" exception for the
> > recovery mode pin, but I believe that goes through a different
> > mechanism now so we're good there.
>
> I believe the recovery mode pin is dropped from recent designs (don't
> quote me in general on that), and there's a different mechanism used
> just to get the at-boot-time "recovery mode" state directly from the
> firmware.
>
> > Even though I didn't do a line-by-line review, I'll still give:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> >
> > ...though it's possible an "Acked-by" would be more in the spirit of
> > that? Not sure...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Brian
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-21 17:28    [W:2.136 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site