lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/13] mtd: spinand: Setup spi_mem_op for the SPI IO protocol using reg_proto
From
Date
Hi Miquèl,

On 07/08/21 12:00 am, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Apurva,
>
> Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com> wrote on Tue, 13 Jul 2021 13:05:28
> +0000:
>
>> Currently, the op macros in spinand.h don't give the option to setup
>> any non-array access instructions for Dual/Quad/Octal DTR SPI bus.
>> Having a function that setups the op based on reg_proto would be
>> better than trying to write all the setup logic in op macros.
>>
>> Create a spimem_setup_op() that would setup cmd, addr, dummy and data
>> phase of the spi_mem op, for the given spinand->reg_proto. And hence,
>> call the spimem_setup_op() before executing any spi_mem op.
>>
>> Note: In this commit, spimem_setup_op() isn't called in the
>> read_reg_op(), write_reg_op() and wait() functions, as they need
>> modifications in address value and data nbytes when in Octal DTR mode.
>> This will be fixed in a later commit.
>
> Thanks for this series!
>
> So far I am fine with your changes, but I don't like the setup_op()
> naming much. I don't yet have a better idea, could you propose
> something more meaningful?
>

I made this similar to the spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(), which essentially
does the same task as this in the spi-nor core.

Other names that I can think of are:

- config_op(), adjust_op(), amend_op(), patch_op()

or

- handle_op_variations(), apply_op_variations()

What do you suggest?

>> Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
Thanks,
Apurva Nandan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-20 11:54    [W:0.063 / U:1.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site