lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/6] iova: Allow rcache range upper limit to be flexible
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 06:36:39PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> Some LLDs may request DMA mappings whose IOVA length exceeds that of the
> current rcache upper limit.

What's an LLD?

> This means that allocations for those IOVAs will never be cached, and
> always must be allocated and freed from the RB tree per DMA mapping cycle.
> This has a significant effect on performance, more so since commit
> 4e89dce72521 ("iommu/iova: Retry from last rb tree node if iova search
> fails"), as discussed at [0].
>
> As a first step towards allowing the rcache range upper limit be
> configured, hold this value in the IOVA rcache structure, and allocate
> the rcaches separately.
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210129092120.1482-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/iommu/iova.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> include/linux/iova.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 98ba927aee1a..4772278aa5da 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static dma_addr_t iommu_dma_alloc_iova(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> * rounding up anything cacheable to make sure that can't happen. The
> * order of the unadjusted size will still match upon freeing.
> */
> - if (iova_len < (1 << (IOVA_RANGE_CACHE_MAX_SIZE - 1)))
> + if (iova_len < (1 << (iovad->rcache_max_size - 1)))
> iova_len = roundup_pow_of_two(iova_len);
>
> dma_limit = min_not_zero(dma_limit, dev->bus_dma_limit);
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
> index b6cf5f16123b..07ce73fdd8c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
> /* The anchor node sits above the top of the usable address space */
> #define IOVA_ANCHOR ~0UL
>
> +#define IOVA_RANGE_CACHE_MAX_SIZE 6 /* log of max cached IOVA range size (in pages) */

Is that the same as an 'order'? i.e. IOVA_RANGE_CACHE_MAX_ORDER?

> +
> static bool iova_rcache_insert(struct iova_domain *iovad,
> unsigned long pfn,
> unsigned long size);
> @@ -881,7 +883,14 @@ static void init_iova_rcaches(struct iova_domain *iovad)
> unsigned int cpu;
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < IOVA_RANGE_CACHE_MAX_SIZE; ++i) {
> + iovad->rcache_max_size = IOVA_RANGE_CACHE_MAX_SIZE;
> +
> + iovad->rcaches = kcalloc(iovad->rcache_max_size,
> + sizeof(*iovad->rcaches), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!iovad->rcaches)
> + return;

Returning quietly here doesn't seem like the right thing to do. At least, I
don't think the rest of the functions here are checking rcaches against
NULL.

Will

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-08-02 17:03    [W:0.068 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site