Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH][next] drm/mgag200: Fix uninitialized variable delta | From | Colin Ian King <> | Date | Tue, 17 Aug 2021 21:11:58 +0100 |
| |
On 17/08/2021 19:22, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 17.08.21 um 18:32 schrieb Colin King: >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >> >> The variable delta is not initialized and this will cause unexpected >> behaviour with the comparison of tmpdelta < delta. Fix this by setting >> it to 0xffffffff. This matches the behaviour as in the similar function >> mgag200_pixpll_compute_g200se_04. >> >> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable") >> Fixes: 2545ac960364 ("drm/mgag200: Abstract pixel PLL via struct >> mgag200_pll") >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> > > But the commit message needs Fixes etc. I just sent out a patch for this > issue myself. I'd like to merge both patches' tags and commit the result > under your name. (You were first.) Is that ok for you?
Sure. Go ahead, Thanks
Colin
> > Best regards > Thomas > >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_pll.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_pll.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_pll.c >> index 7c903cf19c0d..18f1a6dd019a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_pll.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_pll.c >> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ static int mgag200_pixpll_compute_g200se_00(struct >> mgag200_pll *pixpll, long clo >> m = n = p = s = 0; >> permitteddelta = clock * 5 / 1000; >> + delta = 0xffffffff; >> for (testp = 8; testp > 0; testp /= 2) { >> if (clock * testp > vcomax) >> >
| |