lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v15 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for swiotlb data bouncing
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 05:57:21PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:46:07AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 04:05:13PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 03:01:04PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > > FWIW I was pondering the question of whether to do something along those
> > > > lines or just scrap the default assignment entirely, so since I hadn't got
> > > > round to saying that I've gone ahead and hacked up the alternative
> > > > (similarly untested) for comparison :)
> > > >
> > > > TBH I'm still not sure which one I prefer...
> > >
> > > Claire did implement something like your suggestion originally, but
> > > I don't really like it as it doesn't scale for adding multiple global
> > > pools, e.g. for the 64-bit addressable one for the various encrypted
> > > secure guest schemes.
> >
> > Couple of things:
> > - I am not pushing to Linus the Claire's patchset until we have a
> > resolution on this. I hope you all agree that is a sensible way
> > forward as much as I hate doing that.
>
> Sure, it's a pity but we could clearly use a bit more time to get these
> just right and we've run out of time for 5.14.
>
> I think the main question I have is how would you like to see patches for
> 5.15? i.e. as patches on top of devel/for-linus-5.14 or something else?

Yes that would be perfect. If there are any dependencies on the rc1, I
can rebase it on top of that.

>
> Cheers,
>
> Will

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-06 19:03    [W:0.128 / U:2.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site