Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Jul 2021 16:05:13 +0200 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v15 06/12] swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for swiotlb data bouncing |
| |
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 03:01:04PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > FWIW I was pondering the question of whether to do something along those > lines or just scrap the default assignment entirely, so since I hadn't got > round to saying that I've gone ahead and hacked up the alternative > (similarly untested) for comparison :) > > TBH I'm still not sure which one I prefer...
Claire did implement something like your suggestion originally, but I don't really like it as it doesn't scale for adding multiple global pools, e.g. for the 64-bit addressable one for the various encrypted secure guest schemes.
| |