| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 14/69] KVM: x86: Split core of hypercall emulation to helper function | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Date | Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:40:04 +0200 |
| |
On 03/07/21 00:04, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote: > From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> > > By necessity, TDX will use a different register ABI for hypercalls. > Break out the core functionality so that it may be reused for TDX. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +++ > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 9c7ced0e3171..80b943e4ab6d 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -1667,6 +1667,10 @@ void kvm_vcpu_update_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > void kvm_request_apicv_update(struct kvm *kvm, bool activate, > unsigned long bit); > > +unsigned long __kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr, > + unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1, > + unsigned long a2, unsigned long a3, > + int op_64_bit); > int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > int kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, u64 error_code, > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > index d11cf87674f3..795f83a1cf9a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -8406,26 +8406,15 @@ static void kvm_sched_yield(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long dest_id) > return; > } > > -int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +unsigned long __kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long nr, > + unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1, > + unsigned long a2, unsigned long a3, > + int op_64_bit) > { > - unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret; > - int op_64_bit; > - > - if (kvm_xen_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm)) > - return kvm_xen_hypercall(vcpu); > - > - if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu)) > - return kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu); > - > - nr = kvm_rax_read(vcpu); > - a0 = kvm_rbx_read(vcpu); > - a1 = kvm_rcx_read(vcpu); > - a2 = kvm_rdx_read(vcpu); > - a3 = kvm_rsi_read(vcpu); > + unsigned long ret; > > trace_kvm_hypercall(nr, a0, a1, a2, a3); > > - op_64_bit = is_64_bit_mode(vcpu); > if (!op_64_bit) { > nr &= 0xFFFFFFFF; > a0 &= 0xFFFFFFFF; > @@ -8434,11 +8423,6 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > a3 &= 0xFFFFFFFF; > } > > - if (static_call(kvm_x86_get_cpl)(vcpu) != 0) { > - ret = -KVM_EPERM; > - goto out; > - } > - > ret = -KVM_ENOSYS; > > switch (nr) { > @@ -8475,6 +8459,35 @@ int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > ret = -KVM_ENOSYS; > break; > } > + return ret; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_emulate_hypercall); > + > +int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > +{ > + unsigned long nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, ret; > + int op_64_bit; > + > + if (kvm_xen_hypercall_enabled(vcpu->kvm)) > + return kvm_xen_hypercall(vcpu); > + > + if (kvm_hv_hypercall_enabled(vcpu)) > + return kvm_hv_hypercall(vcpu); > + > + nr = kvm_rax_read(vcpu); > + a0 = kvm_rbx_read(vcpu); > + a1 = kvm_rcx_read(vcpu); > + a2 = kvm_rdx_read(vcpu); > + a3 = kvm_rsi_read(vcpu); > + > + op_64_bit = is_64_bit_mode(vcpu); > + > + if (static_call(kvm_x86_get_cpl)(vcpu) != 0) { > + ret = -KVM_EPERM; > + goto out; > + } > + > + ret = __kvm_emulate_hypercall(vcpu, nr, a0, a1, a2, a3, op_64_bit); > out: > if (!op_64_bit) > ret = (u32)ret; >
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|