lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: nvmem: qfprom: Add optional power-domains property
Hi,

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 5:01 AM Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> qfprom devices on some SoCs need to vote on the performance state
> of a power-domain, so add the power-domains optional property to the
> bindings
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
> index 861b205..a498a08 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ properties:
> vcc-supply:
> description: Our power supply.
>
> + power-domains:
> + description: A phandle to a power domain node.
> +

I'm trying to channel my inner Rob here by saying that this
description doesn't add anything and this should just be:

power-domains:
maxItems: 1

Here's an example of Rob saying this:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20210712151322.GA1931925@robh.at.kernel.org/

Other than that, feel free to add my "Reviewed-by" tag.

-Doug

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-29 18:19    [W:0.075 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site