lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 0/1] Mediatek uart patch
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 09:48:16AM +0800, Zhiyong Tao wrote:
> This series includes 1 patches:
> 1.fix uart corruption issue when rx power off
>
> when uart is used as a communication port with external device(GPS).
> when external device(GPS) power off, the power of rx pin is also from
> 1.8v to 0v. Even if there is not any data in rx. But uart rx pin can
> capture the data "0".
> If uart don't receive any data in specified cycle, uart will generates
> BI(Break interrupt) interrupt.
> If external device(GPS) power off, we found that BI interrupt appeared
> continuously and very frequently.
> When uart interrupt type is BI, uart IRQ handler(8250 framwork
> API:serial8250_handle_irq) will push data to tty buffer.
> The code path:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c#L1917
> mtk8250_dma_rx_complete is a task of mtk_uart_apdma_rx_handler.
> mtk8250_dma_rx_complete priority is lower than uart irq
> handler(serial8250_handle_irq).
> if we are in process of mtk8250_dma_rx_complete, uart appear BI
> interrupt:1)serial8250_handle_irq will priority execution.2)it may cause
> write tty buffer conflict in mtk8250_dma_rx_complete.
> So the spin lock protect the rx receive data process is not break.

All of this information should be in the changelog for the patch itself.
There is no need for a "cover letter" for a single patch like this.

Can you redo your 1/1 patch and add the above information to the
changelog text and resend it as a v2?

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-29 08:04    [W:1.058 / U:0.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site