Messages in this thread | | | From | "Kammela, Gayatri" <> | Subject | RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree | Date | Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:59:14 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> > Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 10:56 AM > To: Kammela, Gayatri <gayatri.kammela@intel.com>; Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>; Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > Cc: Gross, Mark <mark.gross@intel.com>; Rajneesh Bhardwaj > <irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Next Mailing List <linux- > next@vger.kernel.org>; Platform Driver <platform-driver- > x86@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree > > Hi, > > On 7/28/21 7:27 PM, Kammela, Gayatri wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 10:02 AM > >> To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > >> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>; Gross, Mark > >> <mark.gross@intel.com>; Kammela, Gayatri > <gayatri.kammela@intel.com>; > >> Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com>; Linux Kernel Mailing > >> List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Next Mailing List <linux- > >> next@vger.kernel.org>; Platform Driver <platform-driver- > >> x86@vger.kernel.org> > >> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 > >> tree > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 7:49 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> After merging the drivers-x86 tree, today's linux-next build > >>> (x86 allmodconfig) failed like this: > >>> > >>> error: the following would cause module name conflict: > >>> drivers/misc/c2port/core.ko > >>> drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.ko > >>> > >>> Caused by commit > >>> > >>> 29036fcc92b22d ("platform/x86/intel: intel_pmc_core: Move > >>> intel_pmc_core* files to pmc subfolder") > >>> > >>> Since there was nothing in the branch yesterday I've just dropped > >>> the tree entirely. > >> > >> Yeah, PMC Makefile should keep the object name the same, something > >> like > >> > >> obj-$(..._PMC_...) += intel_pmc_....o intel-pmc_...-y := core.o ... > > Right, I will drop the patches from pdx86/for-next and do a forced push. > > > Hi Andy and Mark, > > We've found the issue on our side as well and planning to push the fix > soon. Would you prefer to have the whole patch series redone or just the fix > ? > > I've just dropped the current version of the patches, please send the whole > patch series redone. Sure Hans! I will send the whole patch series redone. > > Thanks & Regards, > > Hans
| |