lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next v2] riscv: add VMAP_STACK overflow detection
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:36:47 +0800
tongtiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com> wrote:

> On 2021/7/23 7:54, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:42:52 +0200
> > Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Jul 22 2021, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think we need to pin the stack before calling get_wchan(), could you please
> >>> try below patch?
> >>
> >> Thanks, this fixes the crash for me.
> >>
> >> Andreas.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for testing. I will send out formal patch later
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > .
> >
>
> Hi all:
> I tried to reproduced this crash in openSUSE code repo(
> https://github.com/opensuse/kernel ), but not reproduced successfully.
>
> From the patch of problem repair, the crash is due to task->stack is
> released before calling get_wchan, the task state of maybe TASK_DEAD.
>
> VMAP_STACK is used to detect kernel stack overflow, there is no
> connection between the two, it makes me a little confused.

I believe the bug exists from the first day of riscv mainlined.

Since THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y in riscv, so when task stack can be freed
before being destroyed.

When VMAP_STACK=n, task's stack is allocated from linear mapping. When
task stack is freed, the corresponding mapping still exists, and since
get_wchan() only read, no harm is observed so far.

When VMAP_STACK=y, task's stack is allocated from vmalloc area. When
task stack is freed, the corresponding mapping may not exist, so I expect
MMU fault here, thus the kernel panic.

In summary, the bug isn't related with VMAP_STACK, but VMAP_STACK makes
the bug observable.

Thanks


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-23 06:36    [W:0.068 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site