Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Jul 2021 13:18:23 +0100 | From | Chris Down <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the printk tree |
| |
+Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Stephen Rothwell writes: >After merging the printk tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) >produced this warning: > >kernel/printk/printk.c:1: warning: 'printk' not found > >Introduced by commit > > 337015573718 ("printk: Userspace format indexing support") > >I presume that "printk" is referred to elsewhere in the documentation >as being in this file.
Hmm, this is an interesting one, because I think we still generally just want to refer to the API as being `printk()`. Changing it all over the place seems wrong. As you'd imagine, there are quite a few references to this name, so it requires a lot of noise all over the docs and inline comments.
Jonathan and other docs folks, how can one tell Sphinx that when it sees printk() it's referring to a function-like macro, or otherwise squelch this reasonably? :-) [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |