Messages in this thread | | | From | Vincent Chen <> | Date | Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:19:24 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] riscv: Add support for restartable sequence |
| |
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:43 PM Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote: > > ----- On Mar 9, 2020, at 1:59 AM, Vincent Chen vincent.chen@sifive.com wrote: > [...] > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c > > @@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct > > pt_regs *regs) > > sigset_t *oldset = sigmask_to_save(); > > int ret; > > > > + rseq_signal_deliver(ksig, regs); > > /* Are we from a system call? */ > > if (regs->cause == EXC_SYSCALL) { > > [...] > > As Al Viro pointed out on IRC, the rseq_signal_deliver() should go after syscall > restart handling, similarly to what is done on every other supported architecture.
Thanks for the notification. I will adjust the porting and try to send the patch again for review.
> > Note that there is already an upstream commit derived on this non-upstream patch: > > commit 9866d141a097 ("csky: Add support for restartable sequence") > > which is broken in the same way. > > I'm not sure why I was never CC'd on the csky patch. Considering that nobody > bothered to implement the rseq selftests for csky, I don't see how any of > this is tested. I would favor a revert of that commit until the testing glue > is contributed. Unfortunately, the csky commit has been upstream since v5.7. > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com
| |