lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: New warning in nvme_setup_discard
Date
Hello.

On pondělí 19. července 2021 3:40:40 CEST Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 02:35:14PM +0200, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > On sobota 17. července 2021 14:19:59 CEST Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > > On sobota 17. července 2021 14:11:05 CEST Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > > > On sobota 17. července 2021 11:35:32 CEST Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > Maybe you need to check if the build is OK, I can't reproduce it in
> > > > > my
> > > > > VM, and BFQ is still builtin:
> > > > >
> > > > > [root@ktest-01 ~]# uname -a
> > > > > Linux ktest-01 5.14.0-rc1+ #52 SMP Fri Jul 16 18:56:36 CST 2021
> > > > > x86_64
> > > > > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@ktest-01 ~]# cat
> > > > > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/scheduler
> > > > > [none] mq-deadline kyber bfq
> > > >
> > > > I don't think this is an issue with the build… BTW, with
> > > > `initcall_debug`:
> > > >
> > > > ```
> > > > [ 0.902555] calling bfq_init+0x0/0x8b @ 1
> > > > [ 0.903448] initcall bfq_init+0x0/0x8b returned -28 after 507 usecs
> > > > ```
> > > >
> > > > -ENOSPC? Why? Also re-tested with the latest git tip, same result :(.
> > >
> > > OK, one extra pr_info, and I see this:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > [ 0.871180] blkcg_policy_register: BLKCG_MAX_POLS too small
> > > [ 0.871612] blkcg_policy_register: -28
> > > ```
> > >
> > > What does it mean please :)? The value seems to be hard-coded:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > include/linux/blkdev.h
> > > 60:#define BLKCG_MAX_POLS 5
> > > ```
> >
> > OK, after increasing this to 6 I've got my BFQ back. Please see [1].
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20210717123328.945810-1-oleksandr@nat
> > alenko.name/
> OK, after you fixed the issue in blkcg_policy_register(), can you
> reproduce the discard issue on v5.14-rc1 with BFQ applied? If yes,
> can you test the patch I posted previously?

Yes, the issue is reproducible with both v5.13.2 and v5.14-rc1. I haven't
managed to reproduce it with v5.13.2+your patch. Now I will build v5.14-
rc2+your patch and test further.

Thanks.

--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-19 08:29    [W:0.084 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site