lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] iomap: support tail packing inline read
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 05:31:10PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:11:49AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 05:13:10PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 04:02:30PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > + if (iomap->type == IOMAP_INLINE) {
> > > > > + iomap_read_inline_data(inode, page, iomap, pos);
> > > > > + plen = PAGE_SIZE - poff;
> > > > > + goto done;
> > > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > This is going to break Andreas' case that he just patched to work.
> > > > GFS2 needs for there to _not_ be an iop for inline data. That's
> > > > why I said we need to sort out when to create an iop before moving
> > > > the IOMAP_INLINE case below the creation of the iop.
> > > >
> > > > If we're not going to do that first, then I recommend leaving the
> > > > IOMAP_INLINE case where it is and changing it to ...
> > > >
> > > > if (iomap->type == IOMAP_INLINE)
> > > > return iomap_read_inline_data(inode, page, iomap, pos);
> > > >
> > > > ... and have iomap_read_inline_data() return the number of bytes that
> > > > it copied + zeroed (ie PAGE_SIZE - poff).
> > >
> > > Returning the bytes is much cleaner anyway. But we still need to deal
> > > with the sub-page uptodate status in one form or another.
> >
> > There is another iomap_read_inline_data() caller as in:
> > +static int iomap_write_begin_inline(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
> > + struct page *page, struct iomap *srcmap)
> > +{
> > + /* needs more work for the tailpacking case, disable for now */
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(pos != 0))
> > + return -EIO;
> > + if (PageUptodate(page))
> > + return 0;
> > + iomap_read_inline_data(inode, page, srcmap, pos);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> >
> > I'd like to avoid it as (void)iomap_read_inline_data(...). That's why it
> > left as void return type.
>
> You don't need to cast away the return value in C.

Well, I don't check the current behavior of this, but see:
http://c-faq.com/style/voidcasts.html

Anyway, that's minor and easy to update if really needed.
I'd like to check if it works first...

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-19 20:41    [W:0.051 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site