lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v13 010/137] mm: Add folio flag manipulation functions
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 06:56:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:55:04 -0400 Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> > I agree that _is_ reads nicer by itself, but paired with other ops
> > such as testset, _test_ might be better.
> >
> > For example, in __set_page_dirty_no_writeback()
> >
> > if (folio_is_dirty())
> > return !folio_testset_dirty()
> >
> > is less clear about what's going on than would be:
> >
> > if (folio_test_dirty())
> > return !folio_testset_dirty()
>
> I like folio_is_foo(). As long as it is used consistently, we'll get
> used to it quickly.

I'm not sure that folio_is_private(), folio_is_lru(),
folio_is_waiters(), or folio_is_reclaim() really work.

> Some GNU tools are careful about appending "_p" to
> functions-which-test-something (stands for "predicate"). Having spent
> a lot of time a long time ago with my nose in this stuff, I found the
> convention to be very useful. I think foo_is_bar() is as good as
> foo_bar_p() in this regard.

I just wish C let us put '?' on the end of a function name, but I
recognise the ambiguity with foo?bar:baz;

> And sure, the CaMeLcAsE is fugly, but it sure is useful.
> set_page_dirty() is very different from SetPageDirty() and boy that
> visual differentiation is a relief.

Oh, I'm glad you brought that up </sarcasm>

In folios, here's how that ends up looking:

SetPageDirty() -> folio_set_dirty_flag()
(johannes proposes folio_set_dirty instead)
set_page_dirty() -> folio_mark_dirty()
aops->set_page_dirty() -> aops->dirty_folio()
__set_page_dirty() -> __folio_mark_dirty()
__set_page_dirty_buffers() -> block_dirty_folio()
__set_page_dirty_nobuffers() -> filemap_dirty_folio()
__set_page_dirty_no_writeback() -> dirty_folio_no_writeback()

I kind of feel that last one should be nowb_dirty_folio(), but I'm also
hoping to eliminate it; if the filesystem sets AS_NO_WRITEBACK_TAGS
in mapping->flags, then we just inline the no-writeback case into
folio_mark_dirty() (which already has it for the !mapping case).

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-14 16:05    [W:0.092 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site