Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Patch v3 6/6] dt-bindings: thermal: Add dt binding for QCOM LMh | From | Thara Gopinath <> | Date | Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:54:33 -0400 |
| |
On 7/10/21 12:21 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Thu 08 Jul 07:06 CDT 2021, Thara Gopinath wrote: > >> Add dt binding documentation to describe Qualcomm >> Limits Management Hardware node. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-lmh.yaml | 100 ++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-lmh.yaml >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-lmh.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-lmh.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..7f62bd3d543d >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-lmh.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) >> +# Copyright 2021 Linaro Ltd. >> +%YAML 1.2 >> +--- >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qcom-lmh.yaml# >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> + >> +title: Qualcomm Limits Management Hardware(LMh) >> + >> +maintainers: >> + - Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org> >> + >> +description: >> + Limits Management Hardware(LMh) is a hardware infrastructure on some >> + Qualcomm SoCs that can enforce temperature and current limits as >> + programmed by software for certain IPs like CPU. >> + >> +properties: >> + compatible: >> + enum: >> + - qcom,sdm845-lmh >> + >> + reg: >> + items: >> + - description: core registers >> + >> + interrupts: >> + maxItems: 1 >> + >> + '#interrupt-cells': >> + const: 1 >> + >> + interrupt-controller: true >> + >> + qcom,lmh-cpu-id: >> + description: >> + CPU id of the first cpu in the LMh cluster >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 >> + >> + qcom,lmh-temperature-arm: >> + description: >> + An integer expressing temperature threshold in millicelsius at which >> + the LMh thermal FSM is engaged. > > Do we know (by any public source) what "arm", "low" and "high" means > beyond that they somehow pokes the state machine?
Not from public documentation. I know what these thresholds means, atleast to some extent. Though I will never claim to be an expert in this! There is an error in description of qcom,lmh-temperature-low and qcom,lmh-temperature-high below. I copied and forgot to change the description. I will fix it.
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/int32 >> + >> + qcom,lmh-temperature-low: >> + description: >> + An integer expressing temperature threshold in millicelsius at which >> + the LMh thermal FSM is engaged. >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/int32 >> + >> + qcom,lmh-temperature-high: >> + description: >> + An integer expressing temperature threshold in millicelsius at which >> + the LMh thermal FSM is engaged. >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/int32 >> + >> +required: >> + - compatible >> + - reg >> + - interrupts >> + - #interrupt-cells >> + - interrupt-controller >> + - qcom,lmh-cpu-id >> + - qcom,lmh-temperature-arm >> + - qcom,lmh-temperature-low >> + - qcom,lmh-temperature-high >> + >> +additionalProperties: false >> + >> +examples: >> + - | >> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> >> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h> >> + #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm845.h> > > I don't see why you need qcom,rpmh.h or the interconnect include in this > example.
I could have sworn make dt-bindings check failed. But maybe only The first include is needed. I will remove the other two.
> >> + >> + lmh_cluster1: lmh@17d70800 { >> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-lmh"; >> + reg = <0 0x17d70800 0 0x401>; > > #address- and #size-cells are 1 in the wrapper that validates the > examples, so drop the two zeros.
Ok.
> >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + qcom,lmh-cpu-id = <0x4>; >> + qcom,lmh-temperature-arm = <65000>; >> + qcom,lmh-temperature-low = <94500>; >> + qcom,lmh-temperature-high = <95000>; >> + interrupt-controller; >> + #interrupt-cells = <1>; >> + }; >> + - | > > This is a different example from the one above, if you intended that, > don't you need the #include of arm-gic.h here as well?
Again make dt-bindings check did not fail. It is a different example. So I am not sure of the norm here. Is one example good enough ?
> > Regards, > Bjorn > >> + lmh_cluster0: lmh@17d78800 { >> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-lmh"; >> + reg = <0 0x17d78800 0 0x401>; >> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + qcom,lmh-cpu-id = <0x0>; >> + qcom,lmh-temperature-arm = <65000>; >> + qcom,lmh-temperature-low = <94500>; >> + qcom,lmh-temperature-high = <95000>; >> + interrupt-controller; >> + #interrupt-cells = <1>; >> + }; >> + - | >> -- >> 2.25.1 >>
-- Warm Regards Thara (She/Her/Hers)
| |