lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 5.12 272/700] sched: Dont defer CPU pick to migration_cpu_stop()
Date
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>

[ Upstream commit 475ea6c60279e9f2ddf7e4cf2648cd8ae0608361 ]

Will reported that the 'XXX __migrate_task() can fail' in migration_cpu_stop()
can happen, and it *is* sort of a big deal. Looking at it some more, one
will note there is a glaring hole in the deferred CPU selection:

(w/ CONFIG_CPUSET=n, so that the affinity mask passed via taskset doesn't
get AND'd with cpu_online_mask)

$ taskset -pc 0-2 $PID
# offline CPUs 3-4
$ taskset -pc 3-5 $PID
`\
$PID may stay on 0-2 due to the cpumask_any_distribute() picking an
offline CPU and __migrate_task() refusing to do anything due to
cpu_is_allowed().

set_cpus_allowed_ptr() goes to some length to pick a dest_cpu that matches
the right constraints vs affinity and the online/active state of the
CPUs. Reuse that instead of discarding it in the affine_move_task() case.

Fixes: 6d337eab041d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs set_cpus_allowed_ptr()")
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210526205751.842360-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f59166fe499a..fe5da692dd7a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1919,7 +1919,6 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
struct migration_arg *arg = data;
struct set_affinity_pending *pending = arg->pending;
struct task_struct *p = arg->task;
- int dest_cpu = arg->dest_cpu;
struct rq *rq = this_rq();
bool complete = false;
struct rq_flags rf;
@@ -1952,19 +1951,15 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
if (p->migration_pending == pending)
p->migration_pending = NULL;
complete = true;
- }

- if (dest_cpu < 0) {
if (cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), &p->cpus_mask))
goto out;
-
- dest_cpu = cpumask_any_distribute(&p->cpus_mask);
}

if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
- rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, dest_cpu);
+ rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, arg->dest_cpu);
else
- p->wake_cpu = dest_cpu;
+ p->wake_cpu = arg->dest_cpu;

/*
* XXX __migrate_task() can fail, at which point we might end
@@ -2243,7 +2238,7 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
init_completion(&my_pending.done);
my_pending.arg = (struct migration_arg) {
.task = p,
- .dest_cpu = -1, /* any */
+ .dest_cpu = dest_cpu,
.pending = &my_pending,
};

@@ -2251,6 +2246,15 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
} else {
pending = p->migration_pending;
refcount_inc(&pending->refs);
+ /*
+ * Affinity has changed, but we've already installed a
+ * pending. migration_cpu_stop() *must* see this, else
+ * we risk a completion of the pending despite having a
+ * task on a disallowed CPU.
+ *
+ * Serialized by p->pi_lock, so this is safe.
+ */
+ pending->arg.dest_cpu = dest_cpu;
}
}
pending = p->migration_pending;
--
2.30.2


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-12 09:35    [W:1.789 / U:0.600 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site