lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpmh: Ensure floor BW is enforced for all nodes
On 2021-06-26 02:58, Mike Tipton wrote:
> We currently only enforce BW floors for a subset of nodes in a path.
> All BCMs that need updating are queued in the pre_aggregate/aggregate
> phase. The first set() commits all queued BCMs and subsequent set()
> calls short-circuit without committing anything. Since the floor BW
> isn't set in sum_avg/max_peak until set(), then some BCMs are committed
> before their associated nodes reflect the floor.
>
> Set the floor as each node is being aggregated. This ensures that all
> all relevant floors are set before the BCMs are committed.
>
> Fixes: 266cd33b5913 ("interconnect: qcom: Ensure that the floor
> bandwidth value is enforced")
> Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <mdtipton@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
> b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
> index bf01d09dba6c..f118f57eae37 100644
> --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,11 @@ int qcom_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32
> tag, u32 avg_bw,
> qn->sum_avg[i] += avg_bw;
> qn->max_peak[i] = max_t(u32, qn->max_peak[i], peak_bw);
> }
> +
> + if (node->init_avg || node->init_peak) {
> + qn->sum_avg[i] = max_t(u64, qn->sum_avg[i], node->init_avg);
> + qn->max_peak[i] = max_t(u64, qn->max_peak[i], node->init_peak);
> + }
Hi Mike,
Original problem is BCMs not getting added to commit_list for unused
nodes, right? that is solved by moving *_bcm_voter_add() to
pre_aggregate().
I could not get why we need to do above change, we are enforcing node
votes with floor votes in framework + below code snippet that you
removed.
How would adding this code in qcom_icc_aggregate() make difference? Is
there any other issue that i am not to able to get?
> }
>
> *agg_avg += avg_bw;
> @@ -90,11 +95,6 @@ int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct
> icc_node *dst)
> qp = to_qcom_provider(node->provider);
> qn = node->data;
>
> - qn->sum_avg[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC] = max_t(u64,
> qn->sum_avg[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC],
> - node->avg_bw);
> - qn->max_peak[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC] = max_t(u64,
> qn->max_peak[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC],
> - node->peak_bw);
> -
> qcom_icc_bcm_voter_commit(qp->voter);
>
> return 0;

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-07-01 20:49    [W:0.080 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site