Messages in this thread | | | From | Dmitry Baryshkov <> | Date | Thu, 1 Jul 2021 19:39:29 +0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm8x50: add mmcx power domain |
| |
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 19:17, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 at 15:31, Dmitry Baryshkov > <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On sm8250 dispcc requires MMCX power domain to be powered up before > > clock controller's registers become available. For now sm8250 was using > > external regulator driven by the power domain to describe this > > relationship. Switch into specifying power-domain and required opp-state > > directly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> > > --- > > .../bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml > > index 0cdf53f41f84..48d86fb34fa7 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml > > @@ -55,6 +55,16 @@ properties: > > reg: > > maxItems: 1 > > > > + power-domains: > > + description: > > + A phandle and PM domain specifier for the MMCX power domain. > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > Should you perhaps state that this is a parent domain? Or it isn't? > > Related to this and because this is a power domain provider, you > should probably reference the common power-domain bindings somewhere > here. Along the lines of this: > > - $ref: power-domain.yaml# > > As an example, you could have a look at > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pd-samsung.yaml.
I'll take a look.
> > > + required-opps: > > + description: > > + Performance state to use for MMCX to enable register access. > > + maxItems: 1 > > According to the previous discussions, I was under the assumption that > this property belongs to a consumer node rather than in the provider > node, no?
It is both a consumer and a provider. It consumes SM8250_MMCX from rpmhpd and provides MMSC_GDSC.
> > > + > > required: > > - compatible > > - reg > > @@ -64,6 +74,15 @@ required: > > - '#reset-cells' > > - '#power-domain-cells' > > > > +# Either both properties are present or both are absent > > +dependencies: > > + power-domains: > > + required: > > + - required-opps > > + required-opps: > > + required: > > + - power-domains > > + > > additionalProperties: false > > > > examples: > > -- > > 2.30.2 > > > > Kind regards > Uffe
-- With best wishes Dmitry
| |