Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH] of: of_reserved_mem: match memblock_free with | From | 권오훈 <> | Date | Thu, 01 Jul 2021 23:06:14 +0900 |
| |
When __reserved_mem_init_node called from fdt_init_reserved_mem fails, we try to undo __reserved_mem_alloc_size to prevent memory leak. 'commit d0b8ed47e83a ("of: reserved_mem: fix reserve memory leak")'
Meanwhile, __reserved_mem_alloc_size calls early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch to allocate memory, which calls 1) memblock_remove when rmem is declared nomap, 2) memblock_reserve, otherwise.
static int __init early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch( ... if (nomap) return memblock_remove(base, size);
return memblock_reserve(base, size); }
Therefore the proper undo-logic should be as follows: 1) memblock_add when rmem is declared nomap, 2) memblock_free, otherwise.
Match the undo functions for readability.
Signed-off-by: Ohhoon Kwon <ohoono.kwon@samsung.com> --- drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c index 15e2417974d6..2279e1b55d1d 100644 --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c @@ -273,9 +273,10 @@ void __init fdt_init_reserved_mem(void) if (err != 0 && err != -ENOENT) { pr_info("node %s compatible matching fail\n", rmem->name); - memblock_free(rmem->base, rmem->size); if (nomap) memblock_add(rmem->base, rmem->size); + else + memblock_free(rmem->base, rmem->size); } } } -- 2.17.1
| |