Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:47:42 -0300 | From | Jason Gunthorpe <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] /dev/ioasid uAPI proposal |
| |
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 09/06/21 13:57, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 02:49:32AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > > > Last unclosed open. Jason, you dislike symbol_get in this contract per > > > earlier comment. As Alex explained, looks it's more about module > > > dependency which is orthogonal to how this contract is designed. What > > > is your opinion now? > > > > Generally when you see symbol_get like this it suggests something is > > wrong in the layering.. > > > > Why shouldn't kvm have a normal module dependency on drivers/iommu? > > It allows KVM to load even if there's an "install /bin/false" for vfio > (typically used together with the blacklist directive) in modprobe.conf. > This rationale should apply to iommu as well.
I can vaugely understand this rational for vfio, but not at all for the platform's iommu driver, sorry.
Jason
| |