Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH -next v2] platform/surface: aggregator: Use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail in ssh_packet_layer.c | From | Maximilian Luz <> | Date | Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:37:31 +0200 |
| |
On 6/9/21 9:24 AM, Baokun Li wrote: > Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail() in ssh_packet_layer.c. > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> > ---
Looks good to me, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Regards, Max
> V1->V2: > CC mailist > > .../surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c | 10 +++------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c b/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c > index 15d96eac6811..2f546ad11c4e 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c > @@ -1567,9 +1567,7 @@ static void ssh_ptl_timeout_reap(struct work_struct *work) > clear_bit(SSH_PACKET_SF_PENDING_BIT, &p->state); > > atomic_dec(&ptl->pending.count); > - list_del(&p->pending_node); > - > - list_add_tail(&p->pending_node, &claimed); > + list_move_tail(&p->pending_node, &claimed); > } > > spin_unlock(&ptl->pending.lock); > @@ -1957,8 +1955,7 @@ void ssh_ptl_shutdown(struct ssh_ptl *ptl) > smp_mb__before_atomic(); > clear_bit(SSH_PACKET_SF_QUEUED_BIT, &p->state); > > - list_del(&p->queue_node); > - list_add_tail(&p->queue_node, &complete_q); > + list_move_tail(&p->queue_node, &complete_q); > } > spin_unlock(&ptl->queue.lock); > > @@ -1970,8 +1967,7 @@ void ssh_ptl_shutdown(struct ssh_ptl *ptl) > smp_mb__before_atomic(); > clear_bit(SSH_PACKET_SF_PENDING_BIT, &p->state); > > - list_del(&p->pending_node); > - list_add_tail(&p->pending_node, &complete_q); > + list_move_tail(&p->pending_node, &complete_q); > } > atomic_set(&ptl->pending.count, 0); > spin_unlock(&ptl->pending.lock); >
| |