Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH -next v2] platform/surface: aggregator: Use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail in ssh_request_layer.c | From | Maximilian Luz <> | Date | Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:36:43 +0200 |
| |
On 6/9/21 9:26 AM, Baokun Li wrote: > Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail() in ssh_request_layer.c. > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Looks good to me, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Regards, Max
> --- > V1->V2: > CC mailist > > .../surface/aggregator/ssh_request_layer.c | 10 +++------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_request_layer.c b/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_request_layer.c > index 52a83a8fcf82..fec2d7af2646 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_request_layer.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_request_layer.c > @@ -863,9 +863,7 @@ static void ssh_rtl_timeout_reap(struct work_struct *work) > clear_bit(SSH_REQUEST_SF_PENDING_BIT, &r->state); > > atomic_dec(&rtl->pending.count); > - list_del(&r->node); > - > - list_add_tail(&r->node, &claimed); > + list_move_tail(&r->node, &claimed); > } > spin_unlock(&rtl->pending.lock); > > @@ -1204,8 +1202,7 @@ void ssh_rtl_shutdown(struct ssh_rtl *rtl) > smp_mb__before_atomic(); > clear_bit(SSH_REQUEST_SF_QUEUED_BIT, &r->state); > > - list_del(&r->node); > - list_add_tail(&r->node, &claimed); > + list_move_tail(&r->node, &claimed); > } > spin_unlock(&rtl->queue.lock); > > @@ -1238,8 +1235,7 @@ void ssh_rtl_shutdown(struct ssh_rtl *rtl) > smp_mb__before_atomic(); > clear_bit(SSH_REQUEST_SF_PENDING_BIT, &r->state); > > - list_del(&r->node); > - list_add_tail(&r->node, &claimed); > + list_move_tail(&r->node, &claimed); > } > spin_unlock(&rtl->pending.lock); > } >
| |