lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: device namespaces
From
Date
On 6/9/21 8:38 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 12:16:43PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
>>
>>> On 6/8/21 4:29 PM, Christian Brauner wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 04:10:08PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
[ .. ]
>>> Granted, modifying sysfs layout is not something for the faint-hearted,
>>> and one really has to look closely to ensure you end up with a
>>> consistent layout afterwards.
>>>
>>> But let's see how things go; might well be that it turns out to be too
>>> complex to consider. Can't tell yet.
>>
>> I would suggest aiming for something like devptsfs without the
>> complication of /dev/ptmx.
>>
>> That is a pseudo filesystem that has a control node and virtual block
>> devices that were created using that control node.
>
> Also see android/binder/binderfs.c
>
Ah. Will have a look.

>>
>> That is the cleanest solution I know and is not strictly limited to use
>> with containers so it can also gain greater traction. The interaction
>> with devtmpfs should be simply having devtmpfs create a mount point for
>> that filesystem.
>>
>> This could be a new cleaner api for things like loopback devices.
>
> I sent a patchset that implemented this last year.
>
Do you have a pointer/commit hash for this?

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-09 09:03    [W:0.058 / U:1.912 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site