lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] btrfs: send: use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail
From
Date
On 8/6/21 11:12 am, Baokun Li wrote:
> Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail().
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/send.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
> index bd69db72acc5..a0e51b2416a1 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
> @@ -2083,8 +2083,7 @@ static struct name_cache_entry *name_cache_search(struct send_ctx *sctx,
> */
> static void name_cache_used(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct name_cache_entry *nce)
> {
> - list_del(&nce->list);
> - list_add_tail(&nce->list, &sctx->name_cache_list);
> + list_move_tail(&nce->list, &sctx->name_cache_list);
> }


Looks good.
You can consider open-code name_cache_used() as there is only one user.

Thanks, Anand

> /*
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-08 07:17    [W:1.763 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site