Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jun 2021 13:51:36 +0300 | From | Leon Romanovsky <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 10/15] RDMA/cm: Use an attribute_group on the ib_port_attribute intead of kobj's |
| |
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 12:25:03PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 11:17:35AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> > > > > This code is trying to attach a list of counters grouped into 4 groups to > > the ib_port sysfs. Instead of creating a bunch of kobjects simply express > > everything naturally as an ib_port_attribute and add a single > > attribute_groups list. > > > > Remove all the naked kobject manipulations. > > Much nicer. > > But why do you need your counters to be atomic in the first place? What > are they counting that requires this? Given that they are just a > statistic for userspace, making them be a u64 should work just the same, > right?
The statistic counters are per-port, while the cm.c flows run in asynchronically in parallel for every CM connection.
We need atomic variable to ensure that "write to u64" is not interrupted.
Thanks
| |