lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv2 2/2] kvm: x86: implement KVM PM-notifier
On (21/06/05 10:00), Marc Zyngier wrote:
[..]
> > + select HAVE_KVM_PM_NOTIFIER
>
> if you write this as:
>
> select HAVE_KVM_PM_NOTIFIER if PM

[..]
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_PM) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_PM_NOTIFIER)
>
> ... you can simplify this expression to be a simple
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_PM_NOTIFIER
>
> in both patches.

Thanks.

> > +static int kvm_arch_suspend_notifier(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> > + int i, ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> > + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> > + ret = kvm_set_guest_paused(vcpu);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + pr_err("Failed to pause guest VCPU%d: %d\n",
> > + vcpu->vcpu_id, ret);
>
> Is it really a good idea to fail suspend when a guest doesn't have PV
> time enabled? I also wonder how useful the pr_err() is, given that it
> contains no information that would help identifying which guest failed
> to pause.

No opinion. What shall we do when we fail to suspend the VM?
VM's watchdogs will trigger and maybe panic the system after
resume.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-05 12:00    [W:0.041 / U:1.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site