Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 30 Jun 2021 13:48:01 -0000 | From | "tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker" <> | Subject | [tip: core/rcu] doc: Fix diagram references in memory-ordering document |
| |
The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 58d0db869d7ab8ca97b521f167022caa2c42cbe7 Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/58d0db869d7ab8ca97b521f167022caa2c42cbe7 Author: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> AuthorDate: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 23:58:43 +02:00 Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> CommitterDate: Mon, 10 May 2021 15:39:19 -07:00
doc: Fix diagram references in memory-ordering document
The three diagrams describing rcu_gp_init() all spuriously refer to the same figure, probably due to a copy/paste issue. This commit fixes these references.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> --- Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst index 3f6ce41..11cdab0 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst @@ -339,14 +339,14 @@ The diagram below shows the path of ordering if the leftmost leftmost ``rcu_node`` structure offlines its last CPU and if the next ``rcu_node`` structure has no online CPUs). -.. kernel-figure:: TreeRCU-gp-init-1.svg +.. kernel-figure:: TreeRCU-gp-init-2.svg The final ``rcu_gp_init()`` pass through the ``rcu_node`` tree traverses breadth-first, setting each ``rcu_node`` structure's ``->gp_seq`` field to the newly advanced value from the ``rcu_state`` structure, as shown in the following diagram. -.. kernel-figure:: TreeRCU-gp-init-1.svg +.. kernel-figure:: TreeRCU-gp-init-3.svg This change will also cause each CPU's next call to ``__note_gp_changes()`` to notice that a new grace period has started,
| |