lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC v2-fix-v2 1/1] x86: Introduce generic protected guest abstraction
From
Date


On 6/3/21 11:41 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> Since you are checking for AMD vendor ID, why not use amd_protected_guest_has()?
> Because, as Sean already told you, we should either stick to the
> technologies: TDX or SEV or to the vendors: Intel or AMD - but not
> either or.

Ok. We can go with technologies for now. In future, if protected_guest_has() is extended
for other technologies like MKTME, then we can generalize it base on vendor.

--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-03 20:55    [W:0.307 / U:3.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site