lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Kernel Panic in skb_release_data using genet
Hi Florian,

Sorry for the late reply

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 02:33:17PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 6/2/2021 6:28 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 11:33:18AM +0200, nicolas saenz julienne wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2021-05-31 at 19:36 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>>> That is also how I boot my Pi4 at home, and I suspect you are right, if
> >>>> the VPU does not shut down GENET's DMA, and leaves buffer addresses in
> >>>> the on-chip descriptors that point to an address space that is managed
> >>>> totally differently by Linux, then we can have a serious problem and
> >>>> create some memory corruption when the ring is being reclaimed. I will
> >>>> run a few experiments to test that theory and there may be a solution
> >>>> using the SW_INIT reset controller to have a big reset of the controller
> >>>> before handing it over to the Linux driver.
> >>>
> >>> Adding a WARN_ON(reg & DMA_EN) in bcmgenet_dma_disable() has not shown
> >>> that the TX or RX DMA have been left running during the hand over from
> >>> the VPU to the kernel. I checked out drm-misc-next-2021-05-17 to reduce
> >>> as much as possible the differences between your set-up and my set-up
> >>> but so far have not been able to reproduce the crash in booting from NFS
> >>> repeatedly, I will try again.
> >>
> >> FWIW I can reproduce the error too. That said it's rather hard to reproduce,
> >> something in the order of 1 failure every 20 tries.
> >
> > Yeah, it looks like it's only from a cold boot and comes in "bursts",
> > where you would get like 5 in a row and be done with it for a while.
>
> Here are two patches that you could try exclusive from one another
>
> 1) Limit GENET to a single queue
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> index fcca023f22e5..e400c12e6868 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> @@ -3652,6 +3652,12 @@ static int bcmgenet_change_carrier(struct
> net_device *dev, bool new_carrier)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static u16 bcmgenet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff
> *skb,
> + struct net_device *sb_dev)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct net_device_ops bcmgenet_netdev_ops = {
> .ndo_open = bcmgenet_open,
> .ndo_stop = bcmgenet_close,
> @@ -3666,6 +3672,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops
> bcmgenet_netdev_ops = {
> #endif
> .ndo_get_stats = bcmgenet_get_stats,
> .ndo_change_carrier = bcmgenet_change_carrier,
> + .ndo_select_queue = bcmgenet_select_queue,
> };
>
> /* Array of GENET hardware parameters/characteristics */
>
> 2) Ensure that all TX/RX queues are disabled upon DMA initialization
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> index fcca023f22e5..7f8a5996fbbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
> @@ -3237,15 +3237,21 @@ static void bcmgenet_get_hw_addr(struct
> bcmgenet_priv *priv,
> /* Returns a reusable dma control register value */
> static u32 bcmgenet_dma_disable(struct bcmgenet_priv *priv)
> {
> + unsigned int i;
> u32 reg;
> u32 dma_ctrl;
>
> /* disable DMA */
> dma_ctrl = 1 << (DESC_INDEX + DMA_RING_BUF_EN_SHIFT) | DMA_EN;
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->hw_params->tx_queues; i++)
> + dma_ctrl |= (1 << (i + DMA_RING_BUF_EN_SHIFT));
> reg = bcmgenet_tdma_readl(priv, DMA_CTRL);
> reg &= ~dma_ctrl;
> bcmgenet_tdma_writel(priv, reg, DMA_CTRL);
>
> + dma_ctrl = 1 << (DESC_INDEX + DMA_RING_BUF_EN_SHIFT) | DMA_EN;
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->hw_params->rx_queues; i++)
> + dma_ctrl |= (1 << (i + DMA_RING_BUF_EN_SHIFT));
> reg = bcmgenet_rdma_readl(priv, DMA_CTRL);
> reg &= ~dma_ctrl;
> bcmgenet_rdma_writel(priv, reg, DMA_CTRL);

I had a bunch of issues popping up today so I took the occasion to test
those patches. The first one doesn't change anything, I still had the
crash occurring with it. With the second applied (in addition), it seems
like it's fixed. I'll keep testing and will let you know.

Maxime
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-25 15:01    [W:1.782 / U:2.596 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site