lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] Add kernel logs when sched clock unstable and NO_HZ_FULL is not possible
Date
On Sun, Jun 20 2021 at 15:43, Ani Sinha wrote:

> Commit 4f49b90abb4aca ("sched-clock: Migrate to use new tick
> dependency mask model") had also removed the kernel warning
> message informing the user that it was not possible to turn
> on NO_HZ_FULL. Adding back that log message here. It is
> unhelpful when the kernel turns off NO_HZ_FULL silently
> without informing anyone.
> Also added a kernel log when sched clock is marked as unstable.

Don't do two things at once. See Documentation/process/....

Also your subject line want's a proper prefix.

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c
> index c2b2859ddd82..9f9fe658f8a5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c
> @@ -192,8 +192,11 @@ void clear_sched_clock_stable(void)
>
> smp_mb(); /* matches sched_clock_init_late() */
>
> - if (static_key_count(&sched_clock_running.key) == 2)
> + if (static_key_count(&sched_clock_running.key) == 2) {
> + WARN_ONCE(sched_clock_stable(),
> + "sched clock is now marked unstable.");

What's the WARN for here? That backtrace is largely uninteresting.

> - if (can_stop_full_tick(cpu, ts))
> + if (can_stop_full_tick(cpu, ts)) {
> tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(ts, cpu);
> - else if (ts->tick_stopped)
> - tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(ts, ktime_get());
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Don't allow the user to think they can get
> + * full NO_HZ with this machine.
> + */
> + WARN_ONCE(tick_nohz_full_running,
> + "NO_HZ_FULL will not work for the current system.");

can_stop_full_tick() returning false can be transient and then the user
still has no idea _why_ this is printed.

Also assume the user/admin starts perf and knows he's going to disturb
NOHZ full, then _why_ would he be interested in that warning.

And again the backtrace is useless. The call path is known.

Thanks,

tglx
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-22 17:15    [W:0.061 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site