Messages in this thread | | | From | "" <> | Subject | Re: Utime and stime are less when getrusage (RUSAGE_THREAD) is executed on a tickless CPU. | Date | Tue, 22 Jun 2021 06:49:34 +0000 |
| |
Hi Frederic, Peter, and Mel
> If necessary I guess we can do something like the below, which > would only add the overhead where it's required: > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched/cputime.h b/include/linux/sched/cputime.h > index 6c9f19a33865..ce3c58286062 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sched/cputime.h > +++ b/include/linux/sched/cputime.h > @@ -18,15 +18,16 @@ > #endif /* CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN > -extern void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, > +extern bool task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, > u64 *utime, u64 *stime); > extern u64 task_gtime(struct task_struct *t); > #else > -static inline void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, > +static inline bool task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, > u64 *utime, u64 *stime) > { > *utime = t->utime; > *stime = t->stime; > + return false; > } > > static inline u64 task_gtime(struct task_struct *t) > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c > index 872e481d5098..9392aea1804e 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c > @@ -615,7 +615,8 @@ void task_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, u64 *ut, u64 *st) > .sum_exec_runtime = p->se.sum_exec_runtime, > }; > > - task_cputime(p, &cputime.utime, &cputime.stime); > + if (task_cputime(p, &cputime.utime, &cputime.stime)) > + cputime.sum_exec_runtime = task_sched_runtime(p); > cputime_adjust(&cputime, &p->prev_cputime, ut, st); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(task_cputime_adjusted); > @@ -828,19 +829,21 @@ u64 task_gtime(struct task_struct *t) > * add up the pending nohz execution time since the last > * cputime snapshot. > */ > -void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, u64 *utime, u64 *stime) > +bool task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, u64 *utime, u64 *stime) > { > struct vtime *vtime = &t->vtime; > unsigned int seq; > u64 delta; > + int ret; > > if (!vtime_accounting_enabled()) { > *utime = t->utime; > *stime = t->stime; > - return; > + return false; > } > > do { > + ret = false; > seq = read_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount); > > *utime = t->utime; > @@ -850,6 +853,7 @@ void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, u64 *utime, u64 *stime) > if (vtime->state < VTIME_SYS) > continue; > > + ret = true; > delta = vtime_delta(vtime); > > /* > @@ -861,6 +865,8 @@ void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, u64 *utime, u64 *stime) > else > *utime += vtime->utime + delta; > } while (read_seqcount_retry(&vtime->seqcount, seq)); > + > + return ret; > } > > static int vtime_state_fetch(struct vtime *vtime, int cpu)
I tested this and confirmed that it gives accurate values. Also, task_sched_runtime () is done only on nohz_full CPU, so I think it's a better idea than before. I hope you will incorporate this fix into your mainline.
Thanks. Hitomi Hasegawa
| |