Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:47:45 +0200 | From | Uwe Kleine-König <> | Subject | PWM-Patches for next merge window [Was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM] state |
| |
Hello Thierry,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:11:40PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:41:44PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 08:51:58PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > My problem is not that in the end a solution is picked that wasn't my > > > favourite. My problem is that I have the impression my arguments were > > > not considered but simply ignored. > > > > Another thing that annoys me is that there are currently ~20 open > > patches by me in patchwork, most of them are easy to understand cleanups > > and fixes, most of them are older than Clemens' series and most of them > > are uncommented by you. And in this situation you apply the only > > controversial series. > > Clemens' series is actually older than those cleanups because it's been > in the works for many months now. And the reason why I'm prioritizing > Clemens' series is because it has broader impact and I want to make sure > it gets maximum soaking time in linux-next.
Hmm, I would have done that differently, but I don't expect that you expected agreement from my side.
> Small fixes and cleanups are less likely to break things, so I'm going > to apply them after.
I wonder what's the ideal delay for fixes and cleanups in your book. We're two weeks after merging that high-impact patch series and Linus just released -rc7.
Best regards Uwe
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |