lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH wq/for-next 2/2] workqueue: clean up for_each_pwq()'s documentation
Date
The if/else clause was removed with commit 5a6446626d7e
("workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check").

Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 8a700ccfa313..104e3ef04e33 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -418,9 +418,6 @@ static void show_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq);
* This must be called either with wq->mutex held or RCU read locked.
* If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
* responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online.
- *
- * The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be
- * ignored.
*/
#define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) \
list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node, \
--
2.25.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-02 13:17    [W:0.044 / U:1.744 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site