Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Julian Wiedmann <> | Subject | [PATCH wq/for-next 2/2] workqueue: clean up for_each_pwq()'s documentation | Date | Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:16:55 +0200 |
| |
The if/else clause was removed with commit 5a6446626d7e ("workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check").
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> --- kernel/workqueue.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 8a700ccfa313..104e3ef04e33 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -418,9 +418,6 @@ static void show_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq); * This must be called either with wq->mutex held or RCU read locked. * If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is * responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online. - * - * The if/else clause exists only for the lockdep assertion and can be - * ignored. */ #define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) \ list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node, \ -- 2.25.1
| |