lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2021]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC v2-fix-v2 1/1] x86: Introduce generic protected guest abstraction
From
Date


On 6/2/21 11:19 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> This certainly doesn't capture all of the situations where true would need
> to be returned. For example, SEV, but not SEV-ES, requires that string I/O
> be unrolled, etc.

For AMD following cases should be true right? I can fix it in next version.

case VM_UNROLL_STRING_IO:
case VM_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT:

--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2021-06-02 20:30    [W:0.363 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site